From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Pittsburgh Tribune Review

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-336 (W.D. Pa. May. 4, 2007)

Summary

finding that § 1985 claim based on defamation fails to state a claim “because a conspiracy to defame does not deprive Plaintiff of any federally protected right”

Summary of this case from Evans v. Gloucester Twp.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-336.

May 4, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The above-captioned prisoner civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on March 16, 2007, and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. [2], filed on April 3, 2007, recommended that the complaint be dismissed pursuant to the PLRA screening provisions for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Service was made on the Plaintiff at FCC Yazoo City (Low), P.O. Box 5000, Yazoo City, MS 39194-5000, which was the address listed on the docket. Plaintiff was informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges, he had ten (10) days to file any objections. Plaintiff filed objections. Dkt. [3]. The Court finds that none of the objections is persuasive.

After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2007;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to the PLRA.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. [2], filed on April 3, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Furthermore, Plaintiff's motion to amend, Dkt. [4], is hereby DENIED as futile.

Lastly, the court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Banks v. Pittsburgh Tribune Review

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-336 (W.D. Pa. May. 4, 2007)

finding that § 1985 claim based on defamation fails to state a claim “because a conspiracy to defame does not deprive Plaintiff of any federally protected right”

Summary of this case from Evans v. Gloucester Twp.
Case details for

Banks v. Pittsburgh Tribune Review

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff, v. PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE REVIEW; PUBLISHER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 4, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-336 (W.D. Pa. May. 4, 2007)

Citing Cases

Hall v. Witteman

Skinner v. Dwyer, 1992 WL 265995 at *2 (N.D.N.Y. 1992). The same is true for the publisher, defendant…

Evans v. Gloucester Twp.

”); Lancaster v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 5, 149 F.3d 1228, 1235 (10th Cir.1998) (“While the injury to…