Opinion
No. 72106
03-13-2017
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order expunging a lis pendens in a fraudulent transfer action.
Petitioner holds a judgment against real parties in interest F. Harvey Whittemore and Annette Whittemore. In trying to collect on that judgment, petitioner filed an action seeking to undo an allegedly fraudulent transfer of real property between the Whittemores and the other real parties in interest. And in conjunction with that action, petitioner recorded a lis pendens against the real property. The district court subsequently granted a motion to expunge the lis pendens, and petitioner filed this writ petition.
Having reviewed petitioner's arguments and the appendices in this writ petition, we conclude that petitioner's use of a lis pendens in this action was not appropriate, and the district court therefore properly expunged it. See Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (holding that a writ of mandamus is available to address an arbitrary or capricious abuse of discretion); see also Weddell v. H2O, Inc., 128 Nev. 94, 106, 271 P.3d 743, 751 (2012) (providing that lis pendens are inappropriate vehicles to recover personal money judgments); Levinson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 109 Nev. 747, 752, 857 P.2d 18, 21 (1993) ("[L]is pendens is not available to merely enforce a personal or money judgment. There must be some claim of entitlement to the real property affected by the lis pendens . . . ."). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Bridget E. Robb, District Judge
Gunderson Law Firm
Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson
Echeverria Law Office
McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas
Washoe District Court Clerk