From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 22, 1924
100 So. 922 (Ala. 1924)

Opinion

4 Div. 94.

May 22, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Crenshaw County; Arthur E. Gamble, Judge.

Frank B. Bricken, of Luverne, and Powell Hamilton, of Greenville, for appellant.

James J. Mayfield, of Montgomery, for appellees.


This is the second appeal in this case, and the decree from which this appeal was taken conformed to the opinion of the court. 207 Ala. 297, 92 So. 848, 25 A.L.R. 381. This appeal, therefore, involves the soundness of said opinion, and is in the nature of a second application for rehearing. The former appeal was carefully considered by the section of the court then sitting on the original hearing and upon rehearing and has been duly considered by the other section, before whom the second appeal was argued, and while we are not unmindful of section 5965 of the Code, providing that the former opinion must not be regarded as conclusive, we think that the same is sound and adhere thereto. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 22, 1924
100 So. 922 (Ala. 1924)
Case details for

Bank of Luverne v. Reddoch

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF LUVERNE v. J. Claude REDDOCH et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 22, 1924

Citations

100 So. 922 (Ala. 1924)
211 Ala. 699

Citing Cases

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Garrison

The rule that the decision on first appeal is the law of the case and binding upon the trial court and the…

First National Bank of Mobile v. Bailes

Under the provisions of Tit. 13, § 28, Code of Alabama 1940 (Recompiled 1958), we have held that: "* * * a…