From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Band v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Dec 3, 2013
545 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-14402 D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv-02332-EAK-TBM

12-03-2013

DAVID BAND, individually, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant - Appellee.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and VINSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM:

Honorable C. Roger Vinson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

This is a suit under a professional liability insurance policy. Plaintiff Band claims that defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Co., owed him a duty to defend him in a third-party action. Twin City, responding, claimed that the allegations of the complaint in the third-party action failed to assert conduct that fell within the policy's coverage; to the contrary, such conduct fell within a policy exclusion. The District Court, in an order entered on April 5, 2012, agreed with Twin City and granted its Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Band's complaint. Band appeals. We affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court in its April 5, 2012, order. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Band v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Dec 3, 2013
545 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Band v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BAND, individually, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TWIN CITY FIRE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 3, 2013

Citations

545 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Goldberg v. National Union Fire Insurance

The Eleventh Circuit subsequently affirmed that dismissal because the allegations of the underlying complaint…