From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banco Do Commercio e Industria De Sao Paolo S.A. v. Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1991
173 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 23, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.).


The individual defendants herein, citizens of Brazil, unconditionally agreed to guarantee payment of a promissory note executed by a now bankrupt Brazilian corporation, defendant Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A. On this appeal, defendants argue that the New York courts lack personal jurisdiction over them and therefore may not adjudicate the action on the guarantee.

It is well settled that parties to an agreement may consent to submit to the jurisdiction of a court which would otherwise not have personal jurisdiction over them. (Biener v Hystron Fibers, 78 N.Y.2d 162.) Defendants unequivocally consented, in a 1978 agreement, that any action to enforce their obligations under the guarantee could be brought in any state or federal court sitting in the City of New York, and that the agreement would be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of New York. The record does not support defendants' claims that the 1983 note gave rise to a novation which superceded the jurisdictional provisions of the earlier agreement.

Moreover, the legislature has specifically expressed its willingness that the courts of this state exercise jurisdiction over cases such as the one at hand. (See, General Obligations Law § 5-1402.) Thus, defendants, having agreed not only to submit to New York jurisdiction but to be governed by New York law, may not now argue that this action should be dismissed on the grounds that it is unduly burdensome to the court.

With respect to their claim of defective service, defendants admit that they were served with process in Brazil in accordance with the requirements of CPLR 308, and the papers submitted in support of the motion fail to rebut the affidavit of the process server, asserting that, as an officer of the court in Brazil, he was authorized to effect service of process.

The remaining arguments have been considered and found to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Banco Do Commercio e Industria De Sao Paolo S.A. v. Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1991
173 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Banco Do Commercio e Industria De Sao Paolo S.A. v. Esusa Engenharia e Construcoes S.A.

Case Details

Full title:BANCO DO COMMERCIO E INDUSTRIA DE SAO PAOLO S.A., Respondent, v. ESUSA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 23, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
569 N.Y.S.2d 708

Citing Cases

STUDEBAKER-WORTHINGTON LEASING CORP. v. MATCH

It is well settled that parties to an agreement may consent in advance to submit to the jurisdiction of a…

P.S. Fin. v. Eureka Woodworks, Inc.

"[T]here are a variety of legal arrangements by which a litigant may give express or implied consent to the…