From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banach v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1972
289 N.E.2d 553 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued September 26, 1972

Decided October 6, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, DONALD H. MEAD, J.

Bernard Samuels and Richard B. Alderman for appellant.

Dennis P. Baldwin and Barry M. Shulman for respondent.


Order reversed, without costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment denied upon the ground that the granting of defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was premature. In view of the breadth of the complaints in the tort actions, plaintiff-appellant in this action was entitled to pursue any disclosure proceedings he saw fit to bring. Upon completion of such proceedings or his failure to bring them, defendant-respondent may renew its motion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Banach v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1972
289 N.E.2d 553 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Banach v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD J. BANACH, Appellant, v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY Co., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 6, 1972

Citations

289 N.E.2d 553 (N.Y. 1972)
289 N.E.2d 553
337 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

Jones v. State of New York

The State should not be permitted to benefit by its own refusal to grant claimant these procedures. Its…