From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1896
4 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

April Term, 1896.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ.


Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. —


The facts in this case are not in all respects the same as they were in the Otten case, lately decided by this court ( Otten v. Manhattan R. Co., 2 App. Div. 396), but the principle upon which the reversal in the latter case proceeded is applicable to these facts. The variations are not sufficiently important to affect the result. The judgment should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1896
4 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Bamberger v. Manhattan Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:Max Bamberger, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1896

Citations

4 App. Div. 611 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Citing Cases

Cover v. Hershey Transit Co.

It is impossible to escape the conclusion that the conduct of Mrs. Meads presents a case of negligence on her…