From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baltimore Ohio v. U. S

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 88 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

No. 539.

Decided November 6, 1967.

279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed.

John H. Gobel for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe et al., appellees.


The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Baltimore Ohio v. U. S

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 88 (1967)
Case details for

Baltimore Ohio v. U. S

Case Details

Full title:BALTIMORE OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v . UNITED STATES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 1967

Citations

389 U.S. 88 (1967)

Citing Cases

Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. U.S.

New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States, 99 F. Supp. 394, 401 (D.Mass.), aff'd 342 U.S. 890, 72 S.Ct. 201, 96…

Maxwell v. Bishop

S. 404, 407-408, 88 S.Ct. 523, 19 L.Ed.2d 634 (1967); see Coleman v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 22, 88 S.Ct. 2, 19…