From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballance v. Finkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 2001
281 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 22, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent Housing Authority to assign him the highest priority for a transfer from his current public housing apartment to another apartment in the same development, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ., concur.


At oral argument, petitioner's counsel advised that insofar as petitioner sought assignment to a higher priority, the proceeding is now moot. Petitioner's claim for money damages, apparently based on breach of the warranty of habitability, is not incidental to his claim that he should have been assigned a higher transfer priority, and therefore was properly dismissed (CPLR 7806; see, Matter of Gross v. Perales, 72 N.Y.2d 231, 235-237).


Summaries of

Ballance v. Finkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 2001
281 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Ballance v. Finkel

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS BALLANCE, APPELLANT, v. KALMAN FINKEL, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 154

Citing Cases

Sturm v. Chatham Phenix National Bank

The defendant bank, however, by following this procedure remained a debtor to the bankrupt estate for the…

Robles v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Citywide Admin. Servs.

Petitioner's claim for attorney's fees and expenses is not incidental to his request for review of…