Summary
In Bartlett v. Ball, 142 Mo. 28, 36, 43 S.W. 783, this court said: "Nor is it to be forgotten than retrospective laws are forbidden eo nomine by our State Constitution; and when this is the case it is immaterial whether or not the act interferes with vested rights.
Summary of this case from Graham Paper Company v. GehnerOpinion
I.C. No. 363960
FILED: 30 June 1998
This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission on 10 June 1998 upon the appeal of plaintiff from an Order by Deputy Commissioner Margaret Morgan, filed 27 January 1998.
Plaintiff: Pro Se.
Defendants: Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner Kincheloe, Attorneys, Charlotte, N.C.; Holly L. Saunders, Counsel of Record.***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Order of Dismissal by Deputy Commissioner Margaret Morgan, as well as the Order of Deputy Commissioner Lorrie L. Dollar, filed 21 June 1994. After reviewing the procedural history of this case, the Full Commission has determined that both of the Orders in question were improvidently filed. Therefore, the Full Commission hereby VACATES the 27 January 1998 Order by Deputy Commissioner Morgan and the 21 June 1994 Order by Deputy Commissioner Dollar and ORDERS that this matter be REMANDED to the appropriate region for a full evidentiary hearing.
S/ ________________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ ______________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
S/ ______________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER