From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baldwin v. Moss

U.S.
Jun 10, 1963
374 U.S. 93 (1963)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.

No. 864.

Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for appellants.


The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.

ALLEN v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 93 (1963) ALLEN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HOPEWELL, VIRGINIA. No. 264, Misc. Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Leonard W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.

Sol Goodman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Hopewell, Virginia, for reconsideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12.


Summaries of

Baldwin v. Moss

U.S.
Jun 10, 1963
374 U.S. 93 (1963)
Case details for

Baldwin v. Moss

Case Details

Full title:BALDWIN ET AL. v . MOSS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1963

Citations

374 U.S. 93 (1963)

Citing Cases

Moss v. Burkhart

The intervening Senators filed in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, an original action to annul the Initiative…

Lisco v. Love

; Caesar v. Williams, 84 Idaho 254, 371 P.2d 241, 247-249; Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v.…