Opinion
Civ. No. 1933.
December 31, 1915.
APPLICATION for a writ of mandate.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Bakersfield Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay, ante, p. 289.
Short Sutherland, and Borton Theile, for Petitioner.
E. F. Brittan, and Walter Osborn, for Respondents.
In response to an alternative writ issued herein, the respondents have filed a general demurrer. The facts are the same and the questions presented for decision are the same as in Bakersfield Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay (Civil No. 1934), ante, p. 289 [ 155 P. 132], petition for writ of prohibition, in which decision has been filed this day. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the demurrer is sustained and the application for peremptory writ of mandate herein is denied.