From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

Kansas City Court of Appeals
May 23, 1932
227 Mo. App. 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

May 23, 1932.

Master and Servant. Judgment based upon Workmen's Compensation Act held not reviewable on writ of error.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County. — Hon. Ralph S. Latshaw, Judge.

WRIT QUASHED.

Charles L. Chalender, Farrington Curtis and Paul W. Barnett for defendants in error.

Shughart Johnson for plaintiff in error.


The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Upon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.

In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary.

It has been determined that a judgment based upon the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S.W.2d 168; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S.W.2d 911; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S.W.2d 1108.]

It follows that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends. Boyer, C., concurs.


The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The writ of error is dismissed. All concur.


Summaries of

Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

Kansas City Court of Appeals
May 23, 1932
227 Mo. App. 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

Case Details

Full title:ESTELLA JOYNER BAKER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MASSEY HARRIS COMPANY AND…

Court:Kansas City Court of Appeals

Date published: May 23, 1932

Citations

227 Mo. App. 30 (Mo. Ct. App. 1932)
49 S.W.2d 1060

Citing Cases

State v. Barbata

Sec. 3982, R.S. 1929; State v. Clay, 201 Mo. 681; State v. Mangercino, 30 S.W.2d 763; State v. Messino, 30…

State v. Williams

4 in defendant's motion for new trial are insufficient. Sec. 3735, R.S. 1929; State v. Francis, 52 S.W.2d…