From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Goodale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jan 5, 1932
157 A. 885 (N.H. 1932)

Opinion

Decided January 5, 1932.

PETITION, asking that it be determined whether cash bail held in the hands of the clerk after the obligation thereof had been satisfied was subject to trustee-process.

Transferred without ruling by Burque, J.

Lucier Dowd, for the plaintiff.

Gerald F. Cobleigh, for the defendants.


The facts are incomplete, but apparently the trustee-process is now pending. Under such circumstances a petition for a declaratory judgment cannot be maintained. The statute (Laws 1929, c. 86) was not designed to furnish a substitute for the usual procedure. Where a suit is already pending which raises the question sought to be decided, the petition will not lie. Lisbon District v. Lisbon, ante, 173. No reason appears why the question presented cannot be settled in the trustee suit.

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Baker v. Goodale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jan 5, 1932
157 A. 885 (N.H. 1932)
Case details for

Baker v. Goodale

Case Details

Full title:EMERSON W. BAKER v. MILLARD GOODALE a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Jan 5, 1932

Citations

157 A. 885 (N.H. 1932)
85 N.H. 561

Citing Cases

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Jones

1; Pathe Exchange v. Cobb, 202 A.D. 450, 195 N.Y.S. 661, affirmed 236 N.Y. 539, 142 N.E. 274; Multnomah…

Reynolds v. Chase

A petition for a declaratory judgment is not maintainable upon issues determinable by resort to other…