From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bajaj v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Nov 20, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2006)

Opinion

No. 000013/2005.

November 20, 2006.


Disclosure — Examination before Trial — Transcript of expert deposition taken three months after notice of trial was inadmissible. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 3117 (a) (Use of depositions; impeachment of witnesses; parties; unavailable witness). Uniform Rules for Trial Courts — 22 NYCRR 208.17 (d) (New York City Civil Court; notice of trial; no disclosure after action placed on trial calendar).


Summaries of

Bajaj v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Nov 20, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2006)
Case details for

Bajaj v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Dr. Deepika Bajaj a/a/o Krzysztof Wielgosz, Plaintiff, v. Progressive…

Court:Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County

Date published: Nov 20, 2006

Citations

14 Misc. 3d 1202 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52387

Citing Cases

Forest Rehab. Med. P.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

However, upon the completion of said therapy, her pain level had actually been reduced to a 3. It should be…

Prime Psychological Serv. v. Progressive Cas. Ins.

Defendant thus bears "both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion with respect to the medical…