Summary
In Baird v. Baird (145 N.Y. 659, 664) it is said: "Parol evidence may also be given to show that a writing, purporting to be a contract or obligation, was not in fact intended or delivered as such by the parties.
Summary of this case from Morgenstern v. DiamondOpinion
Argued March 22, 1895
Decided April 16, 1895
W.A. Sutherland for appellant.
George A. Benton for respondent.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance.
BARTLETT, J., concurs; PECKHAM and GRAY, JJ., concur in the result; ANDREWS, Ch. J., dissents; HAIGHT, J., not sitting.
Judgments affirmed.