From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baines v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 19, 2008
962 A.2d 370 (Md. 2008)

Summary

In Baines, in addition to adopting Cuffley's mis-reading and mis-application of Rule 4-243, the Majority opinion misconstrues our precedent involving interpretation of criminal plea agreements, and adopts a new analytical paradigm, which it mis-applies to the facts of this case.

Summary of this case from Baines v. State

Opinion

No. Pet. Docket No. 459.

Granted December 19, 2008.

Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 2643, Sept. Term 2006).


Petitions for Writ of Certiorari.

granted.


Summaries of

Baines v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 19, 2008
962 A.2d 370 (Md. 2008)

In Baines, in addition to adopting Cuffley's mis-reading and mis-application of Rule 4-243, the Majority opinion misconstrues our precedent involving interpretation of criminal plea agreements, and adopts a new analytical paradigm, which it mis-applies to the facts of this case.

Summary of this case from Baines v. State
Case details for

Baines v. State

Case Details

Full title:Baines, Paul Antoine v. State

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 19, 2008

Citations

962 A.2d 370 (Md. 2008)
406 Md. 743

Citing Cases

Baines v. State

We can assume that a competent criminal defense lawyer knows that the guidelines relate to periods of actual…