From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Superintendent

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 17, 1947
60 A.2d 188 (Md. 1947)

Summary

In Bailey v. Superintendent, 190 Md. 735, 60 A.2d 188, George A. Bailey had been awaiting trial on the charge of being an Incorrigible Minor. He pleaded guilty and it was recommended that he be confined in Spring Grove State Hospital until he recovered his reason or be discharged by due course of law.

Summary of this case from McElroy v. Director

Opinion

[H.C. 16, October Term, 1947.]

Decided December 17, 1947.

Habeas Corpus — Application for Leave to Appeal — Must Show Detention For or Confinement As Result of Criminal Prosecution.

Where an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus does not show that applicant is detained for or confined as the result of a prosecution for a criminal offense, the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction and the application must be denied. pp. 735-736

Decided December 17, 1947.

Habeas corpus proceedings on the petition of George A. Bailey against Superintendent of the Spring Grove State Hospital for Insane. On petitioner's application for leave to appeal from refusal of writ.

Application denied.

Before MARBURY, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, and MARKELL, JJ.


This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

This application was filed by George A. Bailey now confined in the Spring Grove State Hospital. In this case the appeal to this court states, "I should have been entitled to a sanity hearing by an empaneled jury of the Law Courts of Baltimore City." In the papers before us, which apparently are the papers before the judge who refused the writ, there is no commitment or other paper showing just why the petitioner was committed. From a letter in the files in this case, it appears that the superintendent of Spring Grove State Hospital wrote a letter containing the following statement, to the bailiff for Judge W. Conwell Smith, "Mr. Bailey was admitted to this hospital on November 15, 1943, on the order of Judge Emory Niles of the Criminal Court of Baltimore. Mr. Bailey had been awaiting trial on the charge of `Incorrigible Minor', No. 4724, Docket of 1943, September Term, 1943. He pleaded `Guilty', and on November 15, 1943, it was recommended by the court that `the prisoner be confined in Spring Grove State Hospital for Insane until he recovers his Reason or Be Discharged by Due Course of Law.'" The letter also stated that in the opinion of the superintendent it would be impossible for the petitioner to adjust outside of the hospital on account of his mental condition.

The Acts of 1945, Chapter 702, which provided for appeals to this Court from the refusal to issue a writ of habeas corpus or from a final order remanding the petitioner or dismissing the proceedings provided in Section 3D: "The provisions of Sections 3A, 3B and 3C shall not apply to any case unless the petitioner is detained for or confined as the result of a prosecution for a criminal offense."

The Acts of 1947, Chapter 625, repealed and re-enacted Sections 3B and 3C of Chapter 702 of the Acts of 1945 with certain changes. However, Sections 3A and 3D supra of Chapter 702 of the Acts of 1945 were not repealed and are still in force and effect.

Therefore as it does not appear that the petitioner here is "detained for or confined as the result of a prosecution for a criminal offense" this Court has no jurisdiction on appeal and the application must be denied.

By Chapter 14 of the Acts of the Extraordinary Session of March, 1944, as amended by Chapter 387 of the Acts of 1945, a method is provided for jury trials, for persons confined in State institutions, for the purpose of having their sanity determined.

Application denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Superintendent

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 17, 1947
60 A.2d 188 (Md. 1947)

In Bailey v. Superintendent, 190 Md. 735, 60 A.2d 188, George A. Bailey had been awaiting trial on the charge of being an Incorrigible Minor. He pleaded guilty and it was recommended that he be confined in Spring Grove State Hospital until he recovered his reason or be discharged by due course of law.

Summary of this case from McElroy v. Director

In Bailey v. Superintendent, 190 Md. 735, and in Miller v. Superintendent, 190 Md. 741, it was held that an accused who had been confined to a mental institution on order of the Criminal Court is not "detained for or confined as the result of a prosecution for a criminal offense."

Summary of this case from McElroy v. Director

In Bailey v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State Hospital, 190 Md. 735, 60 A.2d 188, we held that no appeal lies from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus to obtain a "sanity hearing", because the statute expressly denies a right of appeal in habeas corpus cases "unless the petitioner is detained for or confined as the result of a prosecution for a criminal offense.

Summary of this case from Adams v. May
Case details for

Bailey v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:BAILEY v . SUPERINTENDENT OF SPRING GROVE STATE HOSPITAL FOR INSANE

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 17, 1947

Citations

60 A.2d 188 (Md. 1947)
60 A.2d 188

Citing Cases

Miller v. Superintendent

In Miller v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State Hospital, 190 Md. 741, 60 A.2d 189, we passed upon a…

McElroy v. Director

However, the primary question before us in this case is whether the appellant is now confined as a result of…