From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Board of Supervisors of San Joaquin County

Supreme Court of California
Oct 8, 1884
66 Cal. 10 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         Application for mandamus to compel the board of supervisors to call an election for justice of the peace.

         COUNSEL:

         J. A. Hosmer, and S. L. Terry, for Petitioner.

          McAllister & Bergin, and J. C. Campbell, for Respondent.

         J. C. Burt, amicus curiae.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         We are of opinion that the Act of 1880 (Stat. 1880, p. 35, amending Code Civil Proc., § 110), fixing the terms of office of justices of the peace at two years from the first day of January next succeeding their election, is constitutional, and that these officers are to be elected this year.

         Let the writ issue as prayed for.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Board of Supervisors of San Joaquin County

Supreme Court of California
Oct 8, 1884
66 Cal. 10 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Bailey v. Board of Supervisors of San Joaquin County

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN JOAQUIN…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 8, 1884

Citations

66 Cal. 10 (Cal. 1884)
4 P. 768

Citing Cases

Powers v. City of Richmond

Accordingly, we denied a motion to dismiss the pending appeal ( id. at p. 651), and in a separate decision…

People v. Schmitz

The record shows that the judgment and order were entered on the same day with the appeal, and the record…