From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bailey v. Apfel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 19, 2000
225 F.3d 653 (4th Cir. 2000)

Summary

holding reasonable person in defendant's position would have known his actions were deliberately indifferent when: defendant, although aware of plaintiff's allegations of harassment, took no action other than to hold a meeting at which he allowed the subordinate-harasser to speak; plaintiff was assaulted again later and informed defendant of such; defendant responded that he would arrange a taping session—which fell through; and defendant took no further action until he held a meeting where he allowed subordinate to harass and intimidate plaintiff

Summary of this case from McKelvey v. W. Reg'l Jail

Opinion

No. 00-1066.

July 19, 2000.

Appeal from the D.Md., 80 F.Supp.2d 535.


Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bailey v. Apfel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 19, 2000
225 F.3d 653 (4th Cir. 2000)

holding reasonable person in defendant's position would have known his actions were deliberately indifferent when: defendant, although aware of plaintiff's allegations of harassment, took no action other than to hold a meeting at which he allowed the subordinate-harasser to speak; plaintiff was assaulted again later and informed defendant of such; defendant responded that he would arrange a taping session—which fell through; and defendant took no further action until he held a meeting where he allowed subordinate to harass and intimidate plaintiff

Summary of this case from McKelvey v. W. Reg'l Jail
Case details for

Bailey v. Apfel

Case Details

Full title:Bailey v. Apfel

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2000

Citations

225 F.3d 653 (4th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

Funnekotter v. Agric. Dev. Bank of Zimbabwe

........................................................... 21 Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc., 242…

Webb v. Medical Facilities of America

Therefore, she has not met her burden of pleading. In contrast to the situation here, the plaintiff in EEOC…