From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baez v. Mooney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2021
Case No. 1:20-cv-9-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 1:20-cv-9-SPB-RAL

03-03-2021

ERIC BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER MOONEY, Correctional Industries, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The within civil rights action was commenced on January 15, 2020 when the Plaintiff, an inmate at SCI-Albion, filed his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 1, accompanied by a complaint that was lodged by the clerk of court. ECF No. 1-1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for report and recommendation ("R&R") in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. Judge Lanzillo subsequently granted Plaintiff's renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 5 and 6, and the complaint was filed of record on April 1, 2020. ECF No. 7.

In his complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against four prison officials who are employed at SCI-Albion. Plaintiff appears to be alleging violations of his rights under the First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

On July 6, 2021, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF Nos. 17 and 18. Plaintiff responded on September 16, 2020, ECF No. 26.

On February 8, 2021, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued an R&R, ECF No. [30], recommending that that the Court grant the Defendants' motion with respect to Plaintiff's claim predicated on violations of his Eighth Amendment rights. Judge Lanzillo recommended that the Defendants' motion be denied in all other respects.

Plaintiff's objections to the R&R were due to be filed no later than February 25, 2021. As of this date, no objections have been received.

After de novo review of the Complaint and documents in the case, together with the Defendants' motion, Plaintiff's response thereto, and the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2021, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, ECF No. [17], shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED insofar as it relates to Plaintiff's §1983 claim alleging the violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. In all other respects, the motion shall be, and hereby is, DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued on February 8, 2021 (ECF No. [30]), is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

/s/_________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Baez v. Mooney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2021
Case No. 1:20-cv-9-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Baez v. Mooney

Case Details

Full title:ERIC BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER MOONEY, Correctional Industries, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 3, 2021

Citations

Case No. 1:20-cv-9-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2021)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Morris

Heffley v. Steele, No. 2:17-CV-01624, 2019 WL 5092127, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2019), aff'd, 826 Fed.Appx.…

Miller v. HF Lenz Commpany

At the same time, “any pleading must still contain sufficient factual allegations that, when accepted as…