From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B. Choice Ltd. v. Epicentre Dev. Assocs., Llc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jul 14, 2016
CIVIL ACTION H-14-2096 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION H-14-2096

07-14-2016

B. CHOICE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. EPICENTRE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the court is the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") (Dkt. 201) relating to defendants Epicentre Development Associates, LLC ("Epicentre"), Andrea Frattini, Pierluigi Guiduzzi, PLG Consulting ("PLG"), and F&G Consultancy ("F&G"), Ltd.'s motions to dismiss (Dkts. 157, 158, 159, 160, 161,188), plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 166), and plaintiff and Frattini's motions for sanctions (Dkts. 191, 194).

The M&R advises that any parties wishing to object to the M&R must do so by May 26, 2016. Dkt. 201 at 55-56. The M&R further states that "failure to file written objections within the time period mentioned shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings and legal conclusions on appeal." Id. at 56. The court has received no objections. The court, having reviewed the M&R, relevant documents within the record, and the applicable law, and having received no objections, ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. Pursuant to the M&R, Frattini's 12(b)(2) motion (Dkt. 158) is DENIED, Guiduzzi, PLG, F&G, and the Epicentre defendants's 12(b)(6) motions (Dkts. 157, 159, 160, 161, 188) are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 166) is GRANTED, and plaintiff and Frattini's motions for sanctions (Dkts. 191, 194) are DENIED.

Signed at Houston, Texas on July 14, 2016.

/s/_________

Gray H. Miller

United States District Judge


Summaries of

B. Choice Ltd. v. Epicentre Dev. Assocs., Llc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jul 14, 2016
CIVIL ACTION H-14-2096 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2016)
Case details for

B. Choice Ltd. v. Epicentre Dev. Assocs., Llc.

Case Details

Full title:B. CHOICE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. EPICENTRE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION H-14-2096 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Brickley v. Scantech Identification Beams Sys., LLC

The Barras and Vitale ask that paragraph 336 be stricken because only a financial institution can assert a…