From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aziz v. Village of Great Neck Plaza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1997
239 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 19, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As the plaintiffs' cause of action against the Village of Great Neck Plaza (hereinafter the Village) was properly dismissed on the ground that the Village never received actual, prior, written notice of the alleged defect in the sidewalk which caused the injuries to the plaintiff Roghiegh Aziz (see, Village Law § 6-628), the defendant Midneck Realty Corp. (hereinafter Midneck) may not properly seek contribution from the Village (see, Barry v. Niagara Frontier Tr. Sys., 35 N.Y.2d 629; O'Rourke v Town of Smithtown, 129 A.D.2d 570; Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447). The Supreme Court therefore correctly severed the plaintiffs' action against Midneck, and dismissed Midneck's cross claims against the Village (see also, Boscolo v County of Nassau, 229 A.D.2d 457; Fitzrandolph v. Rodrigue, 205 A.D.2d 496; Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay, 201 A.D.2d 553).

Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Aziz v. Village of Great Neck Plaza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1997
239 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Aziz v. Village of Great Neck Plaza

Case Details

Full title:ROGHIEGH AZIZ et al., Respondents, v. VILLAGE OF GREAT NECK PLAZA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 207

Citing Cases

Scoville v. Town of Amherst

The Water Authority asserted a cross claim seeking contribution from the Town based on the Town's alleged…

Capretto v. City of Buffalo

The Bison defendants finally contend that the court erred in dismissing their cross claims for contribution…