From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 30, 1935
195 Minn. 661 (Minn. 1935)

Summary

In Wisconsin P. L. Co. v. Public Service Comm., 219 Wis. 104, 261 N.W. 711, 262 N.W. 257, a similar result was reached by the Wisconsin court. The Wisconsin statute provided that the state public service commission should fix "just compensation to be paid for the taking of a property of such public utility actually used and useful for the convenience of the public."

Summary of this case from City of Kiowa v. Central Telephone Utilities Corp.

Opinion

No. 30,638.

August 30, 1935.

Certiorari — proceedings — supersedeas.

Motion by defendant to require plaintiff, during pendency of certiorari proceeding in this court, granted upon application of plaintiff to review proceeding under L. 1935, c. 47, to make payments specified in order of court below as condition for extension of time to redeem from mortgage foreclosure sale, or, in lieu thereof, to file adequate supersedeas bond. Order in accordance with opinion.

H.Z. Mendow and Eugene J. Culhane, for plaintiff.

Reuder Carroll, for defendant.



This court having granted a writ of certiorari herein on plaintiff's petition to review a proceeding under L. 1935, c. 47, the defendant and respondent moves this court on August 29, 1935, upon the files and records herein, that plaintiff, during the pendency of this proceeding, pay to the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county the several sums of money at the time specified in order of the court below to be paid to defendant, or, in lieu thereof, that plaintiff file an adequate supersedeas bond.

Now having considered the motion and plaintiff's objection thereto, and being of the opinion that the $250 undertaking for costs is not adequate protection for defendant, who under the decision below was to be paid $250 monthly by plaintiff as a condition for having the time to redeem from the foreclosure extended; and, as the court below is perhaps without power to protect, since certiorari operates as supersedeas (State v. Noonan, 24 Minn. 124), it is ordered that plaintiff, within ten days after notice of this order, file in this court a supersedeas bond, duly approved by the court below, in the sum of $1,500, or, in lieu of such bond, pay to the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county the several sums of money specified by the order of the court below to be paid to defendant, including the payments now in default. In the event that plaintiff neither files a bond as hereby ordered nor makes the payments as herein directed within ten days from notice hereof, the writ of certiorari herein will be recalled and the decision below stand affirmed.


Summaries of

Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 30, 1935
195 Minn. 661 (Minn. 1935)

In Wisconsin P. L. Co. v. Public Service Comm., 219 Wis. 104, 261 N.W. 711, 262 N.W. 257, a similar result was reached by the Wisconsin court. The Wisconsin statute provided that the state public service commission should fix "just compensation to be paid for the taking of a property of such public utility actually used and useful for the convenience of the public."

Summary of this case from City of Kiowa v. Central Telephone Utilities Corp.

In Archer v. General Casualty Co. 219 Wis. 100, 261 N.W. 9, 262 N.W. 257, plaintiff was a named assured who was injured while driving with her husband who, was also a named assured.

Summary of this case from Frye v. Theige
Case details for

Aylmer v. New Hampshire Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA W. AYLMER v. NEW HAMPSHIRE SAVINGS BANK

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 30, 1935

Citations

195 Minn. 661 (Minn. 1935)
262 N.W. 257

Citing Cases

Blasing v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

See also Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 60, 477 N.Y.S.2d 657 (1984);…

Hardtner v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

" In the case of Archer v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, 219 Wis. 100, 261 N.W. 9, 262 N.W. 257, the…