From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avila v. Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 19, 1988
528 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1002.

July 19, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, David L. Levy, J.

Brett Rivkind, Miami, for appellant.

Holland Knight, and Mark J. Buhler and Laurence M. Bardfeld, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Judge Baskin participated in the decision, but did not hear oral argument.


This is an appeal from a trial court order which dismisses, dissolves and discharges a writ of garnishment on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the foreign corporation defendants Pacindat Mutual Protection Indemnity Association, Ltd. and The Pan American Club. We reverse the order under review upon a holding that the said order was prematurely entered before the plaintiff Pedro Luis Avila had a reasonable opportunity to complete his discovery on the jurisdictional issue in this cause. See Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, 340 So.2d 463, 469 (Fla. 1977); A B Pipe Supply Co. v. Turnberry Towers, 500 So.2d 261, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Moore v. Freeman, 396 So.2d 276, 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Lovelace v. Sobrino, 280 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); see also Unitech Corp. v. Atlantic Nat'l Bank, 472 So.2d 817, 818 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); cf. Royal Netherlands S.S. v. Quinto de Garcia, 489 So.2d 128, 130 (Fla. 3d DCA) (plaintiff entitled to discovery from defendant in attempt to establish jurisdiction), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 143 (Fla. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090, 107 S.Ct. 1299, 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987); Cameron v. Odissea Shipping Co., 486 So.2d 30, 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (premature dismissal on jurisdictional issues); Reddish v. Forlines, 207 So.2d 703, 707-08 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) (premature dismissal for failure to prosecute where discovery outstanding).

Upon remand, the trial court shall permit the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to complete his aforesaid discovery and to amend the writ of garnishment should he choose to do so. It should be noted, however, that "[w]hen service of process is to be made under statutes authorizing service on non-residents of Florida, it is sufficient to plead the basis for service in the language of the statute without pleading the facts supporting service." Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(i).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Avila v. Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 19, 1988
528 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Avila v. Pacindat Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO LUIS AVILA, APPELLANT, v. PACINDAT MUTUAL PROTECTION INDEMNITY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 19, 1988

Citations

528 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sunrise Assisted Living v. Ward

The basis for service on a nonresident defendant may be set forth in the language of the statute rather than…

Sovran Bank, N.A. v. Parsons

In sum we hold that the dismissal was premature. Lipman v. Vanowen Realty Corp., 528 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 4th DCA…