From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auto Club Family Insurance Company v. Brady

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Feb 25, 2009
CIVIL NO. 08-704-GPM (S.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 08-704-GPM.

February 25, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiff insurance company filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a finding that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Michael Brady in a case against him filed in state court by Defendant Angela Becker. The Clerk of Court entered default against both Defendants after they failed to timely plead or otherwise defend. Shortly thereafter, Defendant Brady's counsel filed an entry of appearance and attempted to file an answer. The Court struck the answer because it was filed without leave of Court after default had been entered. Defendant Brady then filed a motion to set aside the default and attached his proposed answer. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

The underlying complaint against the insured, Michael Brady, alleges nothing but vicious intentional acts that do not constitute an occurrence under the policy and, moreover, are specifically excluded under Section II(m). Defendant's papers do not suggest that there is even a shadow of a meritorious defense to Plaintiff's timely complaint for declaratory judgment. See, e.g., Breuer Elec. Mfg. Co. v. Toronado Sys. of Am., Inc., 687 F.2d 182, 186 (7th Cir. 1982) (affirming district court's refusal to set aside default where "defendants gave not the slightest indication of any specific defense on the merits" but merely tendered a general denial asserting that they were not liable to plaintiff). As such, there are no grounds for setting aside default, and default judgment will be entered in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) upon Plaintiff's filing of a motion. Defendant Brady's motion to set aside default (Doc. 17) is DENIED.

In Breuer Electric Manufacturing Company v. Toronado Systems of America, Inc., 687 F.2d 182, 186 (7th Cir. 1982), the Court noted the "weakness of defendants' `good cause' showing" in addition to the "conclusory nature of their proposed answer." Defendant Brady's assertion that he had insufficient funds with which to timely hire a lawyer is a similarly weak showing of good cause for default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Auto Club Family Insurance Company v. Brady

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Feb 25, 2009
CIVIL NO. 08-704-GPM (S.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Auto Club Family Insurance Company v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:AUTO CLUB FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BRADY and ANGELA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Feb 25, 2009

Citations

CIVIL NO. 08-704-GPM (S.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 2009)