From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austerman v. Behne, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 28, 2011
Civil 10-4502 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Apr. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil 10-4502 (JRT/FLN).

April 28, 2011

Paul Taylor, TAYLOR ASSOCIATES, LTD, Burnsville, MN, for plaintiff.

Kevin Velasquez and Beth Serrill, BLETHEN GAGE KRAUSE, PLLP, Mankato, MN, for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated April 6, 2011 [Docket No. 22]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [Docket No. 2] is denied.


Summaries of

Austerman v. Behne, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Apr 28, 2011
Civil 10-4502 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Apr. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Austerman v. Behne, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AUSTERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BEHNE, INC. AND NATHAN BEHNE, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Citations

Civil 10-4502 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Apr. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Gunderson v. BNSF Railway Co.

The short and definitive answer to this argument is that it is not a basis to ignore the plain wording of the…