From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atwood v. Chapman

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-16 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 17, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-16 (MTT).

March 17, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 16) of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Atwood v. Chapman

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-16 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Atwood v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:AMBER JENE ATWOOD, Plaintiff, v. TOM CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Mar 17, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-16 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Wolfle v. United States

Privilege can not be defeated by secondary proof. Dawkins v. Rokevy, 1873, 44 L.J.R.Q.B. 63 (Ex.); Atwood v.…

Wilson v. Higbee

But in that case he is honest,-- at least, does not deceive the vendee by misrepresentations. But when he…