From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atwell v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

April, 1921.

Present — Mills, Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ.


The sealed verdict for defendant is against the court's plain charge. To find defendant free from blame, the jury must have disregarded his own account of the way he ran the car from the Boulevard into Bay Sixty-second street, his rash run toward the shore ending in breakneck plunge through the barriers to the beach beneath. If the jury got the unfounded idea that one having a friendly gratuitous ride was not entitled to proper care, and had no remedy for such carelessness, they failed to heed what the court had plainly laid down for their guidance. The order setting aside this verdict is, therefore, unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Atwell v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

Atwell v. Winkler

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ATWELL, as Administrator, etc., of BESSIE ATWELL, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1921

Citations

196 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Citing Cases

Wurtzburger v. Oglesby

v. Leonard, 100 Vt. 1, 134 A. 707; McAndrews v. Leonard, 99 Vt. 512, 134 A. 710; Mitchell v. Raymond, 181…

Nix v. Williams

(1 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 2:65.) Defendant was required to use ordinary and reasonable care to…