From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. Page

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 29, 2005
883 A.2d 912 (Md. 2005)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 79, September Term, 2004.

September 29, 2005.


ORDER

The parties herein have jointly Petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 29TH day of September, 2005,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED, that Respondent shall obtain an escrow and practice monitor for a period of two (2) years commencing thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, with the monitor making monthly reports to the Office of Bar Counsel for the first six months and quarterly reports thereafter; and it is further

Ordered, that judgment be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $148.25 for costs against the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. Page

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 29, 2005
883 A.2d 912 (Md. 2005)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. Page

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Alfred PAGE, Jr.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Sep 29, 2005

Citations

883 A.2d 912 (Md. 2005)
883 A.2d 912

Citing Cases

In re Greenspan

In addition, joint petitions for discipline, which include suspensions, disbarments, and reprimands, must be…