From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sperling

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Aug 26, 2014
439 Md. 691 (Md. 2014)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 95 Sept. Term, 2013.

2014-08-26

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Leonard J. SPERLING, Respondent.


In the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Case No. 03–C–14–002676 AG.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Petitioner Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent Leonard J. Sperling to disbar Respondent, by consent, in which Bar Counsel and Respondent agreed that Respondent violated Rules 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a) and (b), 1.7(a), 1.15(a), (b) and (c), 1.16(d), 3.4(c), 8.1(b), and 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, Maryland Rules 16–606.1, 16–607, and 16–609 and Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Code Ann. § 10–306, it is this 26th day of August, 2014, hereby

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that Respondent Leonard J. Sperling be and hereby is disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall immediately remove the name of Leonard J. Sperling from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16–773(d).


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sperling

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Aug 26, 2014
439 Md. 691 (Md. 2014)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sperling

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Leonard J…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Date published: Aug 26, 2014

Citations

439 Md. 691 (Md. 2014)
439 Md. 691

Citing Cases

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Sperling

The hearing judge found that there was no evidence that Samuel or Jonathan misappropriated funds, or that…