From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AT&T Intellectual Prop. I, LP v. TIVO Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
Case No. 4:10-CV-01059-SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10-CV-01059-SBA

08-11-2011

AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, LP., and AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P., Plaintiffs v. TIVO INC., Defendant. TIVO INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P., and AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P., Counterclaim Defendants.

IRELL & MANELLA LLP Winston Liaw (273899) Attorney for Defendant TiVo Inc. BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. Bryant C. Boren Jr. (SBN 260602) Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. and AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. Attorneys for Plaintiff AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. and AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P.


IRELL & MANELLA LLP

Winston Liaw (273899)

Attorney for Defendant TiVo Inc.

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

Jr. (SBN 260602)

Attorney for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim

Defendants

AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. and

AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P.

Attorneys for Plaintiff AT&T Intellectual

Property I, L.P. and AT&T Intellectual Property

II, L.P.

JOINT STIPULATION TO PERMIT ADAM GOLDBERG AND AZAR MOUZARI TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order permit Adam Goldberg and Azar Mouzari to withdraw as counsel for TiVo, as they are no longer employed at Irell & Manella LLP. All other attorneys involved in the case from Irell & Manella LLP continue to represent TiVo Inc.

Respectfully submitted,

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

Winston Liaw BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

Bryant C. Boren Jr.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that Adam Goldberg and Azar Mouzari have withdrawn as counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff TiVo Inc. in this action.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that, on August 11, 2011, the foregoing document was filed electronically, in compliance with Local Rule CV 5-4, using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses on file with the Clerk of Court.

Winston Liaw


Summaries of

AT&T Intellectual Prop. I, LP v. TIVO Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
Case No. 4:10-CV-01059-SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)
Case details for

AT&T Intellectual Prop. I, LP v. TIVO Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, LP., and AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:10-CV-01059-SBA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Smart Modular Techs., Inc. v. NetList, Inc.

This factor typically favors granting the stay. See AT&T Intellectual Prop. I v. Tivo, Inc., 744 F. Supp. 2d…