From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States

U.S.
Dec 8, 1970
400 U.S. 73 (1970)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

No. 78.

Argued November 12, 1970 Decided December 8, 1970

Together with No. 106, Alabama Power Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

No. 78, 306 F. Supp. 338, and No. 106, 316 F. Supp. 337, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

James O'Malley, Jr., argued the cause for appellants in No. 78. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Walter J. Myskowski, Sheila H. Marshall, and Alfred E. Froh. Charles J. McCarthy argued the cause for appellants in No. 106. With him on the briefs were Arthur L. Winn, Jr., J. Raymond Clark, and Richard J. Hardy.

Deputy Solicitor General Springer argued the cause for the United States et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Edward M. Shulman, William A. Imhof, Robert W. Ginnane, and Arthur J. Cerra. Hugh B. Cox argued the cause for appellees Aberdeen Rockfish Railroad Co. et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were William H. Allen and Michael Boudin.

John F. Donelan and John M. Cleary filed a brief in No. 106 for the National Industrial Traffic League as amicus curiae urging reversal.



The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.


Summaries of

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States

U.S.
Dec 8, 1970
400 U.S. 73 (1970)
Case details for

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. ET AL. v . UNITED STATES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 8, 1970

Citations

400 U.S. 73 (1970)
91 S. Ct. 259

Citing Cases

Students Chal. Reg. Agcy. Pro. (S.C.R.A.P.) v. U.S.

The courts thus reasoned that to review carriers' challenges to a Section 15(7) order would be to interfere…

Aberdeen Rockfish R. Co. v. Scrap

The court first rejected the applicability of the line of lower-court cases, beginning with Algoma Coal Coke…