From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ATKINSON v. BUCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2005
17 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5868.

April 19, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J., and a jury), entered on or about March 24, 2004, in an action for dental malpractice, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding plaintiff $10,000 for past pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award for past pain and suffering and remand for a new trial on that issue only, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless defendant, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to increase the award for past pain and suffering to $75,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

Law Offices of Spencer H. Herman, P.C., Kew Gardens (Spencer H. Herman of counsel), for appellant.

McAloon Friedman, P.C., New York (Kenneth Fox of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.


Plaintiff sustained a broken jaw while undergoing a tooth extraction performed by defendant oral surgeon, whereupon defendant immediately wired plaintiff's mouth shut. Plaintiff was under local anesthesia during the extraction, and therefore did not experience pain at the moment his jaw was fractured, or while his mouth was being wired, but thereafter, over the eight weeks that his mouth was wired, did experience varying degrees of pain and loss of enjoyment of life, could eat only through a straw, and did not go to work. Under the circumstances, the $10,000 award for past pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; cf. Casey v. City of Albany, 63 AD2d 798, appeal dismissed 45 NY2d 838), and we accordingly modify as above indicated.


Summaries of

ATKINSON v. BUCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2005
17 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

ATKINSON v. BUCH

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS ATKINSON, Appellant, v. SANFORD BUCH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 39

Citing Cases

Sourifman v. Amie Cab Corp.

ecord, the verdict will be sustained even where other evidence, if credited, would support a contrary result…

SOURIFMAN v. AMIE CAB CORP.

"A verdict should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence only where it seems palpably wrong and…