From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atkin v. Union Processing Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1983
453 N.E.2d 522 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued May 31, 1983

Decided June 28, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, EDWARD O. PROVENZANO, J.

William D. Eggers, Domenick L. Gabrielli and Frank H. Penski for appellant.

James M. Hartman and Paul J. Yesawich, III, for respondents.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice REID S. MOULE ( 90 A.D.2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Atkin v. Union Processing Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 28, 1983
453 N.E.2d 522 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Atkin v. Union Processing Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS ATKIN et al., Respondents, v. UNION PROCESSING CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 28, 1983

Citations

453 N.E.2d 522 (N.Y. 1983)
453 N.E.2d 522
466 N.Y.S.2d 293

Citing Cases

Woodruff v. Castaldo

The Referee found that specific deviations and omissions in the electrical system, mechanical specifications,…

Waters v. Glasheen

Implicit in this finding is that the plaintiff fully performed the written contract for construction of the…