From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham

U.S.
Jun 5, 2000
530 U.S. 1214 (2000)

Summary

finding that the "OGGETTI" service mark was infringed and diluted by the defendant's use of the "BELL' OGGETTI" mark when both used capital letters, with one merely adding a descriptive adjective to the dominant portion of the mark, and both were used to describe home furnishings which created a likelihood of consumer confusion.

Summary of this case from Meth Lab Cleanup, LLC v. Spaulding Decon, LLC

Opinion

No. 99-1624.

June 5, 2000, October TERM, 1999.


Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 Conn. 597, 741 A. 2d 305.


Summaries of

ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham

U.S.
Jun 5, 2000
530 U.S. 1214 (2000)

finding that the "OGGETTI" service mark was infringed and diluted by the defendant's use of the "BELL' OGGETTI" mark when both used capital letters, with one merely adding a descriptive adjective to the dominant portion of the mark, and both were used to describe home furnishings which created a likelihood of consumer confusion.

Summary of this case from Meth Lab Cleanup, LLC v. Spaulding Decon, LLC
Case details for

ATC Partnership v. Town of Windham

Case Details

Full title:ATC PARTNERSHIP v. TOWN OF WINDHAM ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 5, 2000

Citations

530 U.S. 1214 (2000)

Citing Cases

Weisman v. Auto Body Ass'n of Conn.

The role of the trial court in deciding a motion to strike is to examine the complaint, in the light most…

Wegelin v. Reading Hosp. & Med. Ctr.

See, e.g., Rankin v. Seagate Techs., Inc., 246 F.3d 1145, 1148–1149 (8th Cir.2001) (plaintiff's affidavit…