From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AT&T Information Systems v. City of New York, Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1988
534 N.E.2d 320 (N.Y. 1988)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 1988

Decided December 22, 1988

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Martin B. Stecher, J.

Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Judith R. Greenwald, Edith I. Spivack and Joseph I. Lauer of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Harvey M. Berman and O. Peter Sherwood of counsel), intervenor-appellant pro se. Ira G. Greenberg, Martin J. Eisen, James P. Kratochvill and Richard A. Sinton of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Ernst H. Rosenberger at the Appellate Division ( 137 A.D.2d 7).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

AT&T Information Systems v. City of New York, Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1988
534 N.E.2d 320 (N.Y. 1988)
Case details for

AT&T Information Systems v. City of New York, Abrams

Case Details

Full title:AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 22, 1988

Citations

534 N.E.2d 320 (N.Y. 1988)
534 N.E.2d 320
537 N.Y.S.2d 482

Citing Cases

Travis v. ASSESSMENT REVIEW

In determining the legislative intent with regard to paragraph (i) as it now stands, it is instructive to…

Travis v. Assessment Review

In determining the legislative intent with regard to subdivision (i) as it now stands, it is instructive to…