From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ASTAIRE v. PHYLLIS AVA ASTAIRE McKENZIE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2010
10 Civ. 4305 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2010)

Summary

In Astaire, the plaintiff, Fred Astaire's widow, filed suit to prevent the defendants from presenting the “Fred and Adele Astaire Awards.” Astaire, 2010 WL 2331524, at *1.

Summary of this case from A.V.E.L.A., INC. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC

Opinion

10 Civ. 4305 (MGC).

June 8, 2010

CAPLAN AND ROSS, LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff, New York, NY, By: Brian D. Caplan, Esq., Jonathan J. Ross, Esq.

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Attorneys for Defendants, New York, NY, By: M. Veronica Mullally, Esq., Lani Questembert, Esq.


OPINION


Robyn Astaire, the widow of the great dancer Fred Astaire who died in 1987, sues her step-daughter, Phyllis Ava Astaire McKenzie, Patricia Watt and Yaron Glucksman, two Broadway producers, and Career Transition for Dancers, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation that assists dancers in launching second careers. She sues to enjoin defendants from presenting the "Fred and Adele Astaire Awards." Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants' use of Fred Astaire's name violates the Lanham Act, infringes a common law trademark, and violates the California right of publicity. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order is denied.

Essentially, plaintiff claims a right of publicity in the name Fred Astaire. The Lanham Act does not create a right of publicity without either secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion, the essential elements of a trademark claim. Plaintiff has made no showing that an "Astaire Awards" presentation has acquired a secondary meaning. Plaintiff has not shown that consumers will be deceived into believing that the late Fred Astaire endorsed defendants' awards, which are described as "in tribute" to Fred and Adele Astaire. Accordingly, plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm from the presentation of an award in memory of two great dancers, Fred Astaire and his sister Adele.

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's application for the extraordinary relief of a temporary restraining order is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ASTAIRE v. PHYLLIS AVA ASTAIRE McKENZIE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2010
10 Civ. 4305 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2010)

In Astaire, the plaintiff, Fred Astaire's widow, filed suit to prevent the defendants from presenting the “Fred and Adele Astaire Awards.” Astaire, 2010 WL 2331524, at *1.

Summary of this case from A.V.E.L.A., INC. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC
Case details for

ASTAIRE v. PHYLLIS AVA ASTAIRE McKENZIE

Case Details

Full title:ROBYN ASTAIRE, Plaintiff, v. PHYLLIS AVA ASTAIRE McKENZIE, PATRICIA WATT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

10 Civ. 4305 (MGC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

A.V.E.L.A., INC. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLC

More fundamentally, X One X and V. International assert that Count I should be dismissed because the…

A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Emarilyn Monroe, LLC

always been brought by that celebrity's family, direct heirs, or actual estate. See [ Pirone v. MacMillan,…