From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashley v. Tuten

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 8, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0201 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 8, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0201 SECTION P

03-08-2019

TONY ASHLEY v. JIM TUTEN


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner Tony Ashley's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, [Doc. No. 1], is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 8th day of March, 2019.

/s/ _________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ashley v. Tuten

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Mar 8, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0201 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Ashley v. Tuten

Case Details

Full title:TONY ASHLEY v. JIM TUTEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0201 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 8, 2019)

Citing Cases

Fogleman v. Hubbard

Several courts have declined to read Hartfield as a sweeping decision that requires conversion of all such…

Clark v. Hubbard

In particular, some courts have interpreted Hartfield to require consideration of all Section 2241 petitions…