From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashley v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I
Jun 2, 2010
2010 Ark. App. 473 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

CA 09-1073

Opinion Delivered June 2, 2010

Appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Ninth Division [CV-2008-14052], Honorable Mary McGowan, Judge, Dismissed.


In this action for accounting, appellees, the J.D. Ashley, Sr., Family Limited Partnership (the FLP), Richard Ashley, and J.D. Ashley, Jr., were granted summary judgment and appellant, Charolette Ashley, was held in contempt of court. Charolette appeals from both orders. Charolette is the second wife of J.D. Ashley, Sr. Acting pursuant to an instrument entitled "Durable Special Power of Attorney for Health Care and Other Matters" naming her his attorney-in-fact, she sued appellees for an accounting of Ashley Sr.'s ownership interest in the FLP, alleging that appellees had committed constructive fraud and converted partnership funds. The trial court granted appellees' motion for summary judgment, finding that Charolette had no standing to sue for an accounting of business matters. The trial court further found that Charolette was in contempt for failure to follow the trial court's order of March 5, 2009, to make Ashley, Sr. available for a competency exam. Charolette now challenges these determinations on appeal. We dismiss this appeal for the reasons discussed herein.

The J.D. Ashley, Sr., Family Limited Partnership consisted of J.D. Ashley, Sr., and his four children from his first marriage — Richard H. Ashley, J.D. Ashley, Jr., Melody P. Ashley and Todd H. Ashley. While all were limited partners, J.D. Ashley, Sr., and appellees Richard Ashley and J.D. Ashley, Jr., were also general partners in the family limited partnership.

Charolette's initial brief was filed in December 2009, and both appellees' brief and Charolette's reply brief were filed in February 2010. On March 10, 2010, appellees filed a "Notice of the Fact of Death," stating that J.D. Ashley, Sr. had passed away on March 3, 2010. In response to that notice, Charolette's attorney admitted that Ashley, Sr. had passed away, stating that the causes of action were now the property of the Estate of J.D. Ashley, Sr., but that a personal representative of the estate had not yet been appointed. The above notice and response are pivotal to our disposition of this appeal.

Charolette held a power of attorney for health care and personal matters for Ashley, Sr. It was under this authority that she brought her lawsuit against the FLP and two of her stepsons. However, Charolette's authority under the power of attorney ended at her husband's death. "Any authority to act granted by the power-of-attorney terminated at death. The power of agency ends with death of the principal." Arkansas Bd. of Embalmers Funeral Dirs. v. Reddick, 366 Ark. 89, 94, 233 S.W.3d 639, 643 (2006).

Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-67-322(a) (Repl. 2005) provides that if all appellants die after the appeal is taken but before judgment is rendered, "the executor or administrator of the last surviving appellant or plaintiff, or the heirs or devisees of the appellant or plaintiff in cases where they would be entitled to bring writs of error or prosecute an appeal, may be substituted for the appellant or plaintiff and the cause shall proceed at their suit." Charolette's response admits this was not yet done. Arkansas Code Annotated section 28-48-103 (Repl. 2004) also provides that, for good cause, a special administrator may be appointed pending appointment of an executor or a general administrator to perform duties respecting specific property or to perform particular acts. However, again, as noted in Charolette's response, an executor, administrator, or a special administrator had not been appointed for the estate at the time of the submission of this case.

We find that Charolette's authority to act under the power of attorney given to her by her late husband terminated at his death and that no personal representative or executor of the estate has been named and no special administrator has been appointed. Therefore, there is no party in interest left to prosecute this appeal, and it must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

PITTMAN and GLADWIN, JJ., agree.


Summaries of

Ashley v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I
Jun 2, 2010
2010 Ark. App. 473 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Ashley v. Ashley

Case Details

Full title:J.D. ASHLEY, Sr., By and Through Charolette Ashley as his…

Court:Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I

Date published: Jun 2, 2010

Citations

2010 Ark. App. 473 (Ark. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Infirmary

The Court finds that Plaintiff Smith has failed to state a claim based upon Van Dalsen's death and medical…

Ashley v. Ashley

We dismissed appellant's appeal of Judge McGowan's order without reaching the merits because the decedent's…