From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashkenazi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 1, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.).


The motion court, in considering plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, properly refused to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in that it has not been established that the tile that struck plaintiff in the head, as she was walking down a street in front of defendants' school building, came from the school building, and, assuming it did, that defendants had exclusive control over it. In addition, the purported admission, by way of nonresponse to plaintiff's notice to admit, that the tile was dropped from one of two windows of the school building was properly vacated as bearing upon an ultimate issue that should more appropriately be explored through other disclosure devices ( see, Taylor v. Blair, 116 A.D.2d 204, 206).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Ashkenazi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Ashkenazi v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SHELA ASHKENAZI, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 641

Citing Cases

Martell v. K&K Auto & Towing Corp.

The plaintiffs' cannot "reasonably believe" that no substantial dispute exists with respect to the 41 matters…

Ling v. Tsung

Thus, the plaintiff's notice to admit improperly demanded that Dr. Tsung concede matters that are in dispute…