From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asea, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 21, 1984
748 F.2d 676 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

Opinion

Appeal No. 84-1139.

November 21, 1984.

Bernard J. Babb, Freeman, Wasserman Schneider, New York City, argued for appellant. With him on brief was Philip Yale Simons, New York City, of counsel.

Barbara M. Epstein, New York City, argued for appellee. With her on brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, New York City.

Appealed from Court of International Trade; Newman, Judge.

Before FRIEDMAN, DAVIS and BALDWIN, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) holding that certain shunt reactors imported from Sweden were properly classified under item 682.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the CIT. ASEA, Inc. v. United States, 587 F. Supp. 1072 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Asea, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 21, 1984
748 F.2d 676 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Asea, Inc. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ASEA, INC., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1984

Citations

748 F.2d 676 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Alsthom Atlantique v. United States, (1985)

Plaintiff has adduced much evidence, both before the ITA in its presentation in conjunction with the section…

A a Intern., Inc. v. U.S.

See Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United States, 60 CCPA 100, 103, 471 F.2d 1397, 1398-99 (1973); Eastalco Aluminum…