From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arunga v. Weldon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 15, 1972
469 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-2275.

November 15, 1972.

James Aggrey-Kweggyirr Arunga, in pro. per.

Frederick M. Cunningham, City Atty., Alameda, Cal., Peter W. Davis, of Crosby, Heafey, Roach May, Oakland, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before DUNIWAY, ELY and TRASK, Circuit Judges.


The plaintiff filed an action against the City of Alameda alleging that he had been deprived of rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 1986. The complaint was dismissed on motion upon the ground that the city is not a "person" and cannot be sued under the Civil Rights Act. An amended pleading based upon the same statute against the same defendant was again dismissed and this appeal taken.

An application for a three-judge court was also denied below, but that order is not properly before us.

It is abundantly clear that a municipal corporation is not a "person" subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed. 2d 492 (1961); Moor v. Madigan, 458 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1972); Diamond v. Pitchess, 411 F.2d 565 (9th Cir. 1969). The district court was unquestionably correct and we affirm.


Summaries of

Arunga v. Weldon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 15, 1972
469 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Arunga v. Weldon

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AGGREY-KWEGGYIRR ARUNGA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SGT. WELDON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 1972

Citations

469 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Sethy v. Alameda County Water Dist

We have never squarely decided the question, but one of our cases appears to have applied Monroe v. Pape to a…

Chavez-Salido v. Cabell

Since §§ 1981 and 1983 are parts of what is generally called the Civil Rights Acts, it is tempting to argue…