From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arriaga v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2014
Case No. EDCV 13-1372-AG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-1372-AG (JPR)

10-31-2014

ISAAC FERMIN ARRIAGA, Petitioner, v. A.M. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Superseding Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 6, 2014, Petitioner filed objections to the Superseding R&R, in which he mostly simply "objects," in conclusory fashion, to the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions. He does cite a relatively new Ninth Circuit decision, Sessoms v. Grounds, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 4668005 (9th Cir. Sept. 22, 2014) (en banc), in support of one aspect of his cumulative-error claim. (Objections at 6.) But Sessoms simply stands for the age-old proposition that when a suspect asks for a lawyer during a custodial interrogation, questioning must stop. 2014 WL 4668005, at *5. Here, nothing in the record indicates that Petitioner asked for a lawyer at some point and questioning nonetheless continued. Indeed, Petitioner's counsel cross-examined one of the police detectives who interviewed Petitioner and never raised that subject, despite having a transcript of the interview before him. (See Lodged Doc. 2, 3 Rep.'s Tr. at 614-25, 628-30.) Thus, Sessoms does not help Petitioner.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied without leave to amend, Petitioner's requests for an evidentiary hearing and counsel are denied, and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: October 31, 2014

/s/_________

ANDREW GUILFORD

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arriaga v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2014
Case No. EDCV 13-1372-AG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Arriaga v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC FERMIN ARRIAGA, Petitioner, v. A.M. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-1372-AG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Thuener v. Warden

A "[p]etitioner's reliance on jailhouse lawyers is not an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable…

Thompson v. Grounds

Thus, the issue related to whether California Penal Code § 654 was properly applied to Petitioner's case…