From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J. Aron & Co. v. Jacob

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 18, 1976
527 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1976)

Summary

complying with "spirit" of Rule 6 in Carriage of Goods by Sea Act

Summary of this case from Maahs v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 75-3575. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

February 18, 1976.

Robert Wiegand, II, Brunswick Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

James L. Schupp, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, GODBOLD and GEE, Circuit Judges.



Here there was an agreement to extend the time within which to file suit as provided by COGSA, 46 U.S.C. § 1303(6). The agreement expired on Sunday. The District Court held that filing of suit on the following day, Monday, was not timely. We reach the contrary conclusion and reverse.

The District Court considered inapplicable the common law rule that when an act is to be performed within a given number of days and the last day falls on Sunday, the person charged with acting has the following day to comply. The court relied upon United Fruit Co. v. J. A. Folger Co., 270 F.2d 666 (C.A.5, 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 911, 80 S.Ct. 682, 4 L.Ed.2d 619 (1960). That case held that such a COGSA extension should be strictly construed and the end-date recognized. It did not, however, speak to application of the common law rule concerning Sundays, for it involved delay from one secular day to another. Application of the usual Sunday rule is not a shift to a loose rather than a strict rule, since it would involve but a single day and that rising from a familiar legal principle.

Furthermore, though not applicable to contracts, F.R.Civ.P. 6(a) permits the next business day to be included in the computation of a period of time which would otherwise end on a Sunday, notwithstanding F.R.Civ.P. 77(a) which provides that the District Court is always open for purposes of filing. Allowing this suit would conform to the spirit of the Rules and would be consistent with the treatment of a COGSA limitation period not modified by agreement between the parties.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

J. Aron & Co. v. Jacob

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 18, 1976
527 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1976)

complying with "spirit" of Rule 6 in Carriage of Goods by Sea Act

Summary of this case from Maahs v. U.S.
Case details for

J. Aron & Co. v. Jacob

Case Details

Full title:J. ARON COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. S/S OLGA JACOB, HER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 1976

Citations

527 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Maahs v. U.S.

Our court has consistently held that the method of Rule 6(a) applies to federal statutes of limitations.…

Lawson v. Conyers Chrysler, Plymouth, & Dodge Trucks, Inc.

This court has consistently used Rule 6(a)'s method for computing federal statutory time limitations. J. Aron…