From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 5, 1992
591 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-3283.

December 23, 1991. Rehearing Denied February 5, 1992.

David Ronald Arnett, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As grounds for relief, the motion alleged sentencing error in the trial court's retention of jurisdiction over twenty years of the first one-third of a life sentence. It is improper to retain jurisdiction over a portion of a life sentence. State v. Mobley, 481 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1986); Clark v. State, 489 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Frazier v. State, 488 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1986); Stettler v. State, 475 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we treat appellant's motion as a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, and remand with directions to strike the retention of jurisdiction over a portion of the life sentence.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 5, 1992
591 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Arnett v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RONALD ARNETT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 5, 1992

Citations

591 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Hall v. State

Fenter v. State, 632 So.2d 685, 686 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). See also Arnett v. State, 591 So.2d 1014 (Fla.…