Summary
affirming trial court's continuous triggering decision in view of factual findings that injury-in-fact occurred during each policy period
Summary of this case from Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims MgmtOpinion
1995.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Armstrong World Indus. v. Aetna Casualty Surety
Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1995
35 Cal.App.4th 192 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)
Summaries of
Armstrong World Indus. v. Aetna Casualty Surety
Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1995
35 Cal.App.4th 192 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)
affirming trial court's continuous triggering decision in view of factual findings that injury-in-fact occurred during each policy period
Summary of this case from Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims MgmtIn Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co. (26 Cal.Rptr.2d at 85), the court first noted that the adoption of a trigger based on when the asbestos was discovered would lead inexorably to the conclusion that all the damage occurred during one policy period.
Summary of this case from U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.following Wilkin, Dayton, and Maryland Casualty, in concluding that "own products" exclusion does not apply to preclude coverage where the underlying claim seeks coverage for damage to the structure caused by asbestos contamination rather than damage to the ACBM
Summary of this case from U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Case details for
Armstrong World Indus. v. Aetna Casualty Surety
Case Details
Full title:Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co. ; People v…
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Citations
35 Cal.App.4th 192 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)
26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 35
Citing Cases
U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
However, more certainly such contamination may be deemed to have occurred where there is evidence of ongoing…
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co.In Armstrong World Industries, supra, the court concluded that when property damage takes place during…