From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Sumner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 10, 2013
521 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1420

05-10-2013

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants - Appellees.

Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Sumner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 10, 2013
521 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Sumner

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2013)