From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Sebelius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 10, 2013
Civil/Criminal Action No. 13-cv-00563-RBJ (D. Colo. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Civil/Criminal Action No. 13-cv-00563-RBJ

05-10-2013

W. L. (BILL) ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al, Defendants.

Michael J. Norton John Carson Michelle Bennett


JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON

Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen
Court Reporter: Kara Spitler

Counsel:


Michael J. Norton

John Carson


Michelle Bennett


COURTROOM MINUTES

HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

09:02 a.m. Court in session

Appearances of counsel. Discussion 09:03 Argument by Mr. Norton Colloquy between the Court and Mr. Norton 10:02 Court in Recess
10:17 Court in Session
10:17 Argument by Ms. Bennett Colloquy between the Court and Ms. Bennett 11:10 Rebuttal Argument by Mr. Norton 11:18 Court's findings and conclusions entered on the record ORDERED: The Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is (ECF No. 12) is DENIED. 11:45 a.m. Court in Recess

Hearing concluded

Time: 2 hours and 28 minutes


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Sebelius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 10, 2013
Civil/Criminal Action No. 13-cv-00563-RBJ (D. Colo. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Sebelius

Case Details

Full title:W. L. (BILL) ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

Civil/Criminal Action No. 13-cv-00563-RBJ (D. Colo. May. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

g that “[t]he harm in delaying the implementation of a statute that may later be deemed constitutional must…