Opinion
Argued June 2, 1873
Decided June 10, 1873
Edward Harris for the appellant.
W.F. Cogswell for the respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below, GROVER, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Armstrong v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1873
53 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1873)
Summaries of
Armstrong v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1873
53 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1873)
Case details for
Armstrong v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:TRUMAN ARMSTRONG, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 10, 1873
Citations
53 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1873)
Citing Cases
Minor v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
These facts, uncontradicted and unexplained, would be sufficient, we think, to permit a jury to find that the…